There is support for different Operating Systems using the Cisco An圜onnect please see.The Install package is a lot smaller for An圜onnect.We haven’t really had any client troubles yet with An圜onnect although it’s fairly new. Sometimes Eclipse WAN support has had calls around a corrupt install of the VPN client. Ease of administration (this could go either way).This is usually no big deal because you are actually using it on a quicker, newer machine running a 64 Bit OS. An圜onnect reportedly uses more processing power and systems resources to establish the connection.The An圜onnect can be launched from a web page on the router. ![]() Often users firewalls will block IPSEC traffic or interfere with it (home users firewalls, Barnes and Nobles, Cell card firewalls, etc) An圜onnect runs on port 443 so many firewalls will not interfere with traffic on An圜onect vs an IPSEC software VPN.So there is usually an additional cost associated with the An圜onnect VPN Client. ![]() Some equipment includes licenses, others do not (it’s hardware specific). The An圜onnect has separate licensing fees through Cisco. The security IOS that runs on routers we sell customers generally includes IPSec VPN clients. The major differences to a company considering the move to An圜onnect would be: From a users perspective it’s almost just a different way to do the same thing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |